Skip to main content

On the Electoral College

With all due respect to the wisdom and genius of the Founding Fathers, I believe they got one thing wrong: the electoral college.

It is completely understandable.  I sometimes forget that there were no other democracies at the time; they were breaking new ground.  Whenever I hear politicians or pundits dodge hard questions by saying they don't want to engage in speculation, I think, "What cowardice."  The Founders had no maps, no manuals, no precedents to inform them other than the ancient Greeks, whose democracies were only for a small minority of the people, or the democratic principles practiced by some Native American tribes.

So, it is understandable that they were hesitant to turn over all the power to all the people.  Even today, I think if we're honest, not many of us are completely comfortable with 100% suffrage.  I know I've felt that democracy is good, but I'm a little nervous about "those guys" voting.  "Those guys" might be different guys for all of us, but I think, if we're honest, we all have some trepidation about "some guys".

And so, it seems to me, they came up with a democracy that was limited to those whom they thought would best be given the franchise to vote: white, male property owners.  And not only that, but they put in what they thought would be a hedge against the radicals even in that select group.  They created an electoral body that could overrule the popular vote in the case that the majority went off the rails and wanted to elect someone too far outside the bounds of rationality.

I am not a presidential historian, so I can only guess as to the qualifications of all of our presidents.  But if ever there was a candidate who was obviously unqualified, but extremely charismatic to enough voters, it would be Donald Trump. If ever there was a candidate who, if in spite of garnering the popular vote, should be disqualified by the one safeguard the Founders created, it would be Trump.

Yet, exactly the opposite happened.  The unruly, sometimes ignorant or disinterested public, which now included not only white male property owners, but all adults of all races and backgrounds, including women, voted against Trump, while the electoral college put him in office.

For various reasons that the Founders could not have imagined: the size of  the country, the diversity, the technology, the vast sums of money spent in elections today,  the Electoral College failed in its only duty, and, therefore, should be abolished.
                                       
PeteBarkett.blogspot.com
August 7, 2019

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC      I'm calling on all Democrats to end the gridlock in Congress.  The plan is theoretically simple, perhaps a bit more difficult to achieve.  Here's what you do:  register to vote as a Republican.  "Are you crazy?," you say.  Let me explain.      I first conceived of this idea after the umpteenth election where a Democrat led in the polls, then was defeated handily in the election, due to voter suppression, redistricting, racial and political gerrymandering, and blatantly biased election laws, not to dismiss the possibility of tampering with unaccountable and hackable voting machines.  I thought that if Black, Latino, Asian and other minority voters registered as Republicans, it might make it more difficult to unethically suppress their ability to vote.      But then, thinking back to the days of Dixiecrats (Southern Democrats who beginning around ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Let's Play Spy Games

Let's Play Spy Games      We've recently learned that a US asset inside the Kremlin had to leave Russia and come to live in the US.   This started me thinking in the most simplistic terms about international intelligence activities.   Of course, I have no credentials in this area, so this is just the speculation of a curious citizen.      We know that Vladimir Putin was formerly head of the KGB, one of the main intelligence agencies of the former Soviet Union.   As such, I would be surprised if he did not surveil everyone in his administration.   I'm guessing that this would entail giving false information to select people, then seeing if any of that info later turned up in some other countries' news, thus pointing directly to a particular person in his confidence.        Of course, US intelligence agencies are aware of this type of play, and have ways of countering it, or using it to our adva...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Coronavirus

On Coronavirus   On July 28th, in his corona virus update, President Trump said that there are large areas of the country that are free from the virus.   He was immediately attacked for that statement.   That attack was unfair because, contrary to his normal struggles with integrity, in this case he was exactly correct.   Three undeniable examples confirm this.   Firs29t, take deserts for example.   The high deserts of the northwest states combine with the Mojave, the Sonoran, and the other southwest deserts to comprise an area of 200,000 - 300,000 square miles which are almost completely plague free.     Add in Alaska, almost all of which is covid free, and which is nearly one third the size of the contiguous states and you have an extremely large area.   Second, lakes.   The Great Salt Lake is great.   Don't forget Lake Tahoe, a million lakes in Minnesota, and the Everglades and other swamps.   Then there are the ...
Post a Comment
Read more