Skip to main content

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC


     I'm calling on all Democrats to end the gridlock in Congress.  The plan is theoretically simple, perhaps a bit more difficult to achieve.  Here's what you do:  register to vote as a Republican.  "Are you crazy?," you say.  Let me explain.
     I first conceived of this idea after the umpteenth election where a Democrat led in the polls, then was defeated handily in the election, due to voter suppression, redistricting, racial and political gerrymandering, and blatantly biased election laws, not to dismiss the possibility of tampering with unaccountable and hackable voting machines.  I thought that if Black, Latino, Asian and other minority voters registered as Republicans, it might make it more difficult to unethically suppress their ability to vote.
     But then, thinking back to the days of Dixiecrats (Southern Democrats who beginning around 1948 began voting Republican as a protest against civil rights actions by the federal government), it occurred to me that the reverse could also be effective, not only for trying to fight against voter suppression, but also in bringing moderation back into our political system.  It could be argued that Dixiecrats started the push to the right in both the Democratic and Republican parties that is now continued by the Tea Party and vast corporate funding.  Republicans fear being "primaried", that is, being opposed in the primary election by a far right opponent.  Similarly, Democrats feel pressured to move further to the right to win elections.
     I have been coming around to the opinion that the problems are not so much liberal vs. conservative as they are zealot vs. reasonable.  I believe the zealots are wielding far more influence than their policies should receive.
     So, here's what I'd like to see:  vast numbers of Democrats register as Republicans. Moderate Republicans then are able to win primaries against "tea party type" candidates.  If more moderate Republicans are then represented in general elections, Democrats would have to move further left (where they belong) to distinguish themselves from their opponents.  "Republicrats" are then free to vote for whomever in the general election.  Either way, more moderate people are elected to Congress and compromise and courtesy start to flourish again in politics (at least, in public).  I'm tired of voting for the lesser of evils; let's vote for reasonable candidates.  Keep in mind that polls show that substantial majorities of Americans support many of the same principles, such as election reform, Wall Street regulation, keeping jobs in America, addressing climate change with urgency, etc.  While I do agree with the principle of protecting minority views from the tyranny of the majority, it's time our government started representing the majority a bit more often.
     An added benefit might be that powerful groups in both major parties might wield their influence to get their extreme candidates back into the mix.  I wouldn't be surprised, say, to see the Koch brothers pressure both major parties to allow candidates from the Tea Party and the like into the debates, which would then open up the debates to Libertarians, Greens, etc., which I believe would be a good thing.
     Basically, I've seen little progress in trying to move the Democratic Party back to the left, even with the success of Bernie Sanders.  By moving out of the party, we might be able to move better Democratic and Republican parties back into contention again.  And let's do it right away, because there's no time to waste.


Pete Barkett
June, 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Henry and The Common Good

Well John Henry said to the captain "By   god I ain't no fool Before I die with a hammer in my hand I'm gonna get me a steam drill, too, lord, lord Get me a steam drill, too" - parody by the great Smothers Brothers They had the right idea.   Instead of millions of workers being put out of work by robots, workers should have ownership of the robots that replace them, which they then lease to the companies that they once worked for, giving them a wage, a stake in the success of the company, and the opportunity to do other work as well.   This would be not too dissimilar to the annual dividends that all Alaskans get from the energy companies, although there will need to be an alternative as we move away from fossil fuels.   This would all fall under the broad umbrella of taking care of the common good, a concept that we've too often replaced with individualism.   Entrepreneurial spirit is fine.   I had it when I ran a small business. ...
The National Rifle Association-backed gun advocates claim that passing this law or that law wouldn't have prevented this mass shooting or that mass shooting.  It's a completely false argument.  It's like saying that passing this election reform law or that election reform law wouldn't have prevented Donald Trump or Mitch McConnell or Paul Ryan from being elected.  It may be true, but it would be a good start. - Pete Barkett   02/22/18

Musings

  Right-To-Lifers Don’t Go Far Enough       I was pro-choice, but I’ve changed my mind.   The problem is not that the State should govern what a woman does with her body, the problem is that the State has not gone far enough.   The argument is that to protect the life of a fetus, the State must overrule a woman’s privacy and bodily autonomy and regulate her body for her.   Fine.   If we want the State to be in the business of protecting life through bodily regulation, then go all in.   Stick to the prime directive.   Protect all life.   The State should govern both men and women to protect life.   The State should tell any healthy person what to do with their body in order to protect life.   So, if someone needs a kidney, liver, or any organ transplant to save their life, the State should find someone and take whatever parts are needed to save that life.   If not, then we are allowing organ-icide.   (...