Skip to main content

On the Electoral College

With all due respect to the wisdom and genius of the Founding Fathers, I believe they got one thing wrong: the electoral college.

It is completely understandable.  I sometimes forget that there were no other democracies at the time; they were breaking new ground.  Whenever I hear politicians or pundits dodge hard questions by saying they don't want to engage in speculation, I think, "What cowardice."  The Founders had no maps, no manuals, no precedents to inform them other than the ancient Greeks, whose democracies were only for a small minority of the people, or the democratic principles practiced by some Native American tribes.

So, it is understandable that they were hesitant to turn over all the power to all the people.  Even today, I think if we're honest, not many of us are completely comfortable with 100% suffrage.  I know I've felt that democracy is good, but I'm a little nervous about "those guys" voting.  "Those guys" might be different guys for all of us, but I think, if we're honest, we all have some trepidation about "some guys".

And so, it seems to me, they came up with a democracy that was limited to those whom they thought would best be given the franchise to vote: white, male property owners.  And not only that, but they put in what they thought would be a hedge against the radicals even in that select group.  They created an electoral body that could overrule the popular vote in the case that the majority went off the rails and wanted to elect someone too far outside the bounds of rationality.

I am not a presidential historian, so I can only guess as to the qualifications of all of our presidents.  But if ever there was a candidate who was obviously unqualified, but extremely charismatic to enough voters, it would be Donald Trump. If ever there was a candidate who, if in spite of garnering the popular vote, should be disqualified by the one safeguard the Founders created, it would be Trump.

Yet, exactly the opposite happened.  The unruly, sometimes ignorant or disinterested public, which now included not only white male property owners, but all adults of all races and backgrounds, including women, voted against Trump, while the electoral college put him in office.

For various reasons that the Founders could not have imagined: the size of  the country, the diversity, the technology, the vast sums of money spent in elections today,  the Electoral College failed in its only duty, and, therefore, should be abolished.
                                       
PeteBarkett.blogspot.com
August 7, 2019

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Henry and The Common Good

Well John Henry said to the captain "By   god I ain't no fool Before I die with a hammer in my hand I'm gonna get me a steam drill, too, lord, lord Get me a steam drill, too" - parody by the great Smothers Brothers They had the right idea.   Instead of millions of workers being put out of work by robots, workers should have ownership of the robots that replace them, which they then lease to the companies that they once worked for, giving them a wage, a stake in the success of the company, and the opportunity to do other work as well.   This would be not too dissimilar to the annual dividends that all Alaskans get from the energy companies, although there will need to be an alternative as we move away from fossil fuels.   This would all fall under the broad umbrella of taking care of the common good, a concept that we've too often replaced with individualism.   Entrepreneurial spirit is fine.   I had it when I ran a small business. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Musings

  Right-To-Lifers Don’t Go Far Enough       I was pro-choice, but I’ve changed my mind.   The problem is not that the State should govern what a woman does with her body, the problem is that the State has not gone far enough.   The argument is that to protect the life of a fetus, the State must overrule a woman’s privacy and bodily autonomy and regulate her body for her.   Fine.   If we want the State to be in the business of protecting life through bodily regulation, then go all in.   Stick to the prime directive.   Protect all life.   The State should govern both men and women to protect life.   The State should tell any healthy person what to do with their body in order to protect life.   So, if someone needs a kidney, liver, or any organ transplant to save their life, the State should find someone and take whatever parts are needed to save that life.   If not, then we are allowing organ-icide.   (...
Post a Comment
Read more
The National Rifle Association-backed gun advocates claim that passing this law or that law wouldn't have prevented this mass shooting or that mass shooting.  It's a completely false argument.  It's like saying that passing this election reform law or that election reform law wouldn't have prevented Donald Trump or Mitch McConnell or Paul Ryan from being elected.  It may be true, but it would be a good start. - Pete Barkett   02/22/18
Post a Comment
Read more