Skip to main content

On Bucking the Odds

A good friend of mine expressed this sentiment concerning the Brett Kavanaugh nomination to the Supreme Court: "He'll get appointed no matter what Democrats do or the public does."  The same could be said about Donald Trump and Republican Senators and Representatives carrying out their agendas. 

That conclusion, while often true, reflects an attitude that disturbs me.  It's an attitude of resignation and defeat, where I would prefer an attitude of committing to the struggle despite the odds.  Now I agree that one should be as objective as possible, particularly in terms of strategizing in the face of overwhelming odds.  One's options can be extremely limited.  But if you quit the fight before it's over, you're just accepting victimization, which can quickly turn into seeking pity. 

I prefer losing in the ring to seeking pity for quitting the fight.  I believe even the person quoted above believes, or wants to believe, the same.  That person happens to be a big fan of the "Star Wars" films, a favorite scene being when Han Solo tells his android advisor, "Don't tell me the odds!",  when going into an almost hopeless battle.  Granted, in the movies the heroes always beat the odds, but the lesson for me is that people want to believe in fighting against great odds.

I recommend strongly considering continuing the fight.  Even if you lose, you are not a subject of pity if you have tried your best.  I have been criticized for tilting at windmills, but I prefer that to being criticized for surrendering too soon.

"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. "   - Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

- PeteBarkett.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let's Play Spy Games

Let's Play Spy Games      We've recently learned that a US asset inside the Kremlin had to leave Russia and come to live in the US.   This started me thinking in the most simplistic terms about international intelligence activities.   Of course, I have no credentials in this area, so this is just the speculation of a curious citizen.      We know that Vladimir Putin was formerly head of the KGB, one of the main intelligence agencies of the former Soviet Union.   As such, I would be surprised if he did not surveil everyone in his administration.   I'm guessing that this would entail giving false information to select people, then seeing if any of that info later turned up in some other countries' news, thus pointing directly to a particular person in his confidence.        Of course, US intelligence agencies are aware of this type of play, and have ways of countering it, or using it to our adva...
  The Trump Legend        What is the Trump story?   It will be quite different for followers and detractors.   I believe the reason that so many people can have completely opposite views of the same person and events lies in great part to our American, and perhaps human, myths.       I had occasion once to be watching a televangelist in the company of some fundamentalist in-laws.   Seeing this person crying while singing a hymn, I thought he was the phoniest person I had ever seen.   But one of my wife's aunts turned to me and said, "Isn't he the most sincere person you've ever seen?"   I didn't answer, but it occurred to me that we were sitting in the same room watching the same event with completely opposite views.   I love studying history, but I am now more careful to try and research the historian.       Some of us like to believe in heroic leaders following their ...

On Coronavirus

On Coronavirus   On July 28th, in his corona virus update, President Trump said that there are large areas of the country that are free from the virus.   He was immediately attacked for that statement.   That attack was unfair because, contrary to his normal struggles with integrity, in this case he was exactly correct.   Three undeniable examples confirm this.   Firs29t, take deserts for example.   The high deserts of the northwest states combine with the Mojave, the Sonoran, and the other southwest deserts to comprise an area of 200,000 - 300,000 square miles which are almost completely plague free.     Add in Alaska, almost all of which is covid free, and which is nearly one third the size of the contiguous states and you have an extremely large area.   Second, lakes.   The Great Salt Lake is great.   Don't forget Lake Tahoe, a million lakes in Minnesota, and the Everglades and other swamps.   Then there are the ...