Skip to main content

Let's Play Spy Games


Let's Play Spy Games

     We've recently learned that a US asset inside the Kremlin had to leave Russia and come to live in the US.  This started me thinking in the most simplistic terms about international intelligence activities.  Of course, I have no credentials in this area, so this is just the speculation of a curious citizen.
     We know that Vladimir Putin was formerly head of the KGB, one of the main intelligence agencies of the former Soviet Union.  As such, I would be surprised if he did not surveil everyone in his administration.  I'm guessing that this would entail giving false information to select people, then seeing if any of that info later turned up in some other countries' news, thus pointing directly to a particular person in his confidence. 
     Of course, US intelligence agencies are aware of this type of play, and have ways of countering it, or using it to our advantage.  But . . .
     Imagine that Putin gives this type of info to one of his underlings, and that the information is extremely flattering or is of monetary interest, or both, to Donald Trump.  Then imagine that Trump meets secretly with Putin, with no advisors, no secretary, perhaps not even an American translator.  Then imagine that in that meeting Putin asks Trump a seemingly innocuous question which would reveal to Putin that Trump heard the false information.  Does any rational person think that Trump would be savvy enough to realize what was going on and keep his mouth shut?  Or do our intelligence agencies have to pull their informants out of danger, not knowing if they have been compromised?
     I'm sure that the intelligence games that are being played are much more complicated and sophisticated than this, so you can imagine my concern every time Trump opens his mouth in private or in public.  I have no confidence that Trump, who refuses briefings, who brags about doing things his way, who denigrates our intelligence organizations, and who has shown himself to be far, far less than a "stable genius" can be trusted to play this kind of game.
     Just one more argument that being a danger to US interests is impeachable, regardless of whether or not a crime has been committed.

PeteBarkett.blogspot.com
September 9, 2019

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  The Trump Legend        What is the Trump story?   It will be quite different for followers and detractors.   I believe the reason that so many people can have completely opposite views of the same person and events lies in great part to our American, and perhaps human, myths.       I had occasion once to be watching a televangelist in the company of some fundamentalist in-laws.   Seeing this person crying while singing a hymn, I thought he was the phoniest person I had ever seen.   But one of my wife's aunts turned to me and said, "Isn't he the most sincere person you've ever seen?"   I didn't answer, but it occurred to me that we were sitting in the same room watching the same event with completely opposite views.   I love studying history, but I am now more careful to try and research the historian.       Some of us like to believe in heroic leaders following their ...
Post a Comment
Read more
I believe in god - my god.   I believe partly because my parents believed and raised me to believe.   But mostly because of my mortality.   My tenuous existence drives me to believe in a god or gods, or life forces, in outerworldly notions unsupported by any evidence other than the similar language or desires of others. Since the affirmation of others is the only support I have, I seek out affirmation in as many places and ways as I can find.   I try to spread the joy and comfort I experience from affirmation to others, claiming that I want them to share in what I have found, but actually needing to reaffirm my belief. The more people I can find or persuade toward my belief, the better. If I am insecure in my belief, I may become more adamant in my desire to spread my belief. I may become a missionary to teach my word.   If that is not enough, I may threaten those who disagree.   I may chastise or condemn them.   I may shun them.   I may imp...
Post a Comment
Read more
That's How the Light Gets In On Economic Perspective $Million per day My argument in today's blog is that the rich, especially the ultra-rich do not need protection from people advocating redistribution of wealth downward.   I'm recalling "Joe, the Plumber", (who was not named Joe and was not a plumber) who was used by a conservative Presidential candidate to exemplify that liberals would try to tax away the opportunity to start a business and become wealthy.  Also, I've been accused of being a conspiracy theorist when I've complained that the ultra-wealthy collude to protect and increase their massive wealth.    So, I'll address three issues at once: 1.  Are we trying to deprive the wealthy of their lifestyle? 2.  Do ultra-wealthy have the time, resources, and inclination to conspire to strongly influence politics and economics? 3.  To get an idea of economics in general, it helps to have an understanding of wealth. ...
1 comment
Read more