Skip to main content
On the Benefit of the Doubt, for Countries and Catholics

For the past 50 years I have given a pass to average citizens when it comes to the actions of their governments.  I will continue to do so for the citizens who live under monarchies or dictatorships, because they have extremely little voice in public policy, and dissent can be very dangerous, if not fatal.  However, citizens of democracies I now hold more accountable.

The events of the past two years have caused me to change my thinking.  During that time when the actions of the Trump campaign and administration were abhorrent, I first blamed them.  Then, gradually I began to give a considerable share of the blame to Republicans in Congress, who have allowed it.

But listening to the comparisons to the Nixon administration gave me additional insight, things I didn't remember or was unaware of dispite living through the Watergate era.  Namely, Republicans then did not act until the polls showed that the disapproval of their constituents threatened their reelection.  That puts the ultimate responsibility on the average citizens.  It's a little cynical to think that politicians will frequently only do the right thing when threatened by removal from office, but, on the other hand, that's exactly what representative democracy is about.

So, we, the people, might consider complaining a bit less, and demonstrating and voting a bit more.

Similarly, I would not hold Catholics accountable for the actions of their priest, bishops, cardinals, and popes in the past, but now I do.  Even though a church is certainly not a democracy, members are not compelled to support any church philosophically or monetarily.  They can vote with their feet and their pocketbooks, but seldom do.  Incidentally, there was reporting in Mother Jones magazine, I believe, of similar sexual abuse and cover-up among the Jehovah's Witnesses, and, I have heard, many other religious groups. 

I appreciate that organizations like Catholic Charities do wonderful work.  But many, many groups do wonderful work in many areas, but do not use that to justify allowing and covering up abuse.

Ultimately, we average citizens are at least partially accountable for ignoring or rationalizing horrid behavior.

- PeteBarkett.blogspot.com
09/02/18

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  The Trump Legend        What is the Trump story?   It will be quite different for followers and detractors.   I believe the reason that so many people can have completely opposite views of the same person and events lies in great part to our American, and perhaps human, myths.       I had occasion once to be watching a televangelist in the company of some fundamentalist in-laws.   Seeing this person crying while singing a hymn, I thought he was the phoniest person I had ever seen.   But one of my wife's aunts turned to me and said, "Isn't he the most sincere person you've ever seen?"   I didn't answer, but it occurred to me that we were sitting in the same room watching the same event with completely opposite views.   I love studying history, but I am now more careful to try and research the historian.       Some of us like to believe in heroic leaders following their ...

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC      I'm calling on all Democrats to end the gridlock in Congress.  The plan is theoretically simple, perhaps a bit more difficult to achieve.  Here's what you do:  register to vote as a Republican.  "Are you crazy?," you say.  Let me explain.      I first conceived of this idea after the umpteenth election where a Democrat led in the polls, then was defeated handily in the election, due to voter suppression, redistricting, racial and political gerrymandering, and blatantly biased election laws, not to dismiss the possibility of tampering with unaccountable and hackable voting machines.  I thought that if Black, Latino, Asian and other minority voters registered as Republicans, it might make it more difficult to unethically suppress their ability to vote.      But then, thinking back to the days of Dixiecrats (Southern Democrats who beginning around ...

On Coronavirus

On Coronavirus   On July 28th, in his corona virus update, President Trump said that there are large areas of the country that are free from the virus.   He was immediately attacked for that statement.   That attack was unfair because, contrary to his normal struggles with integrity, in this case he was exactly correct.   Three undeniable examples confirm this.   Firs29t, take deserts for example.   The high deserts of the northwest states combine with the Mojave, the Sonoran, and the other southwest deserts to comprise an area of 200,000 - 300,000 square miles which are almost completely plague free.     Add in Alaska, almost all of which is covid free, and which is nearly one third the size of the contiguous states and you have an extremely large area.   Second, lakes.   The Great Salt Lake is great.   Don't forget Lake Tahoe, a million lakes in Minnesota, and the Everglades and other swamps.   Then there are the ...