Skip to main content

John Henry and The Common Good


Well John Henry said to the captain
"By  god I ain't no fool
Before I die with a hammer in my hand
I'm gonna get me a steam drill, too, lord, lord
Get me a steam drill, too"

- parody by the great Smothers Brothers

They had the right idea.  Instead of millions of workers being put out of work by robots, workers should have ownership of the robots that replace them, which they then lease to the companies that they once worked for, giving them a wage, a stake in the success of the company, and the opportunity to do other work as well. 

This would be not too dissimilar to the annual dividends that all Alaskans get from the energy companies, although there will need to be an alternative as we move away from fossil fuels. 

This would all fall under the broad umbrella of taking care of the common good, a concept that we've too often replaced with individualism.  Entrepreneurial spirit is fine.  I had it when I ran a small business.  But I believe we've all seen what happens when "free enterprise" replaces respect for the commons: vulture capitalism, disregard for the environment, disrespect for civil rights.

In this vein, I hear from my libertarian-leaning friends that it isn't fair to the entrepreneurs to limit their opportunities, that they deserve the profits because they take the risks.  In the same manner, I hear that progressive taxation (higher tax rates as incomes climb) also isn't fair.  It would be better if everyone paid the same percentage.  I have two replies.  First, not much is fair, especially if you try and take a pure look at it.  We are always balancing personal good versus public good.  Using the same percentage works fairly well for average incomes, but not at all for the extremes. 

A person making minimum wage has no disposable income (income after paying for necessities, such as rent or mortgage, food, transportation, health care, child care, etc.).  Low wage earners have little or none.  Whereas, a wealthy person might have close to 100% disposable income.  Perhaps an equal percentage tax on disposable income would be more fair.  Then there is the inherent unfairness of where and to whom you are born.

But, second, fairness isn't the only good measure.  Sometimes, we would be wise to take into account the common good.  In an earlier blog, I laid out a representation of what massive accumulation of wealth might look like.  In my summary I pointed out that the top ten billionaires at that time had $610.5 billion.  I posed the question: Is it better for the economy to have 10 multi-billionaires or 610,500 millionaires?  It might be fair by today's standards, but is it good for society?  I think there are many answers and nuances, but we should at least be asking the questions.

P.S. I highly recommend The Common Good by Robert Reich

- PeteBarkett.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC      I'm calling on all Democrats to end the gridlock in Congress.  The plan is theoretically simple, perhaps a bit more difficult to achieve.  Here's what you do:  register to vote as a Republican.  "Are you crazy?," you say.  Let me explain.      I first conceived of this idea after the umpteenth election where a Democrat led in the polls, then was defeated handily in the election, due to voter suppression, redistricting, racial and political gerrymandering, and blatantly biased election laws, not to dismiss the possibility of tampering with unaccountable and hackable voting machines.  I thought that if Black, Latino, Asian and other minority voters registered as Republicans, it might make it more difficult to unethically suppress their ability to vote.      But then, thinking back to the days of Dixiecrats (Southern Democrats who beginning around ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Let's Play Spy Games

Let's Play Spy Games      We've recently learned that a US asset inside the Kremlin had to leave Russia and come to live in the US.   This started me thinking in the most simplistic terms about international intelligence activities.   Of course, I have no credentials in this area, so this is just the speculation of a curious citizen.      We know that Vladimir Putin was formerly head of the KGB, one of the main intelligence agencies of the former Soviet Union.   As such, I would be surprised if he did not surveil everyone in his administration.   I'm guessing that this would entail giving false information to select people, then seeing if any of that info later turned up in some other countries' news, thus pointing directly to a particular person in his confidence.        Of course, US intelligence agencies are aware of this type of play, and have ways of countering it, or using it to our adva...
Post a Comment
Read more
 Bannon Up! This analogy is far from perfect, but it represents to me a futile mindset.   A sacrifice bunt in baseball involves giving up an out to advance a runner into a better position to score a run.   Occasionally, a pitcher tries so hard to throw pitches that are difficult to bunt, that he ends up walking the batter, which moves the lead runner into scoring position, gets no out, and puts another runner on base.   I’ve heard former coaches and players announcing games cry, “He’s trying to make an out.   Let him!”   I believe Steve Bannon wants to go to prison, to make himself a martyr and hero to the right-wing nuts who support him.   I say, let him.   I’ve heard some pundits worry that convicting him would further infuriate the right-wing nuts.   I think it’s time to abandon that type of thinking.   We have seen time after time that making concessions to appease these people is completely unproductive.   They see conces...
Post a Comment
Read more