Skip to main content

John Henry and The Common Good


Well John Henry said to the captain
"By  god I ain't no fool
Before I die with a hammer in my hand
I'm gonna get me a steam drill, too, lord, lord
Get me a steam drill, too"

- parody by the great Smothers Brothers

They had the right idea.  Instead of millions of workers being put out of work by robots, workers should have ownership of the robots that replace them, which they then lease to the companies that they once worked for, giving them a wage, a stake in the success of the company, and the opportunity to do other work as well. 

This would be not too dissimilar to the annual dividends that all Alaskans get from the energy companies, although there will need to be an alternative as we move away from fossil fuels. 

This would all fall under the broad umbrella of taking care of the common good, a concept that we've too often replaced with individualism.  Entrepreneurial spirit is fine.  I had it when I ran a small business.  But I believe we've all seen what happens when "free enterprise" replaces respect for the commons: vulture capitalism, disregard for the environment, disrespect for civil rights.

In this vein, I hear from my libertarian-leaning friends that it isn't fair to the entrepreneurs to limit their opportunities, that they deserve the profits because they take the risks.  In the same manner, I hear that progressive taxation (higher tax rates as incomes climb) also isn't fair.  It would be better if everyone paid the same percentage.  I have two replies.  First, not much is fair, especially if you try and take a pure look at it.  We are always balancing personal good versus public good.  Using the same percentage works fairly well for average incomes, but not at all for the extremes. 

A person making minimum wage has no disposable income (income after paying for necessities, such as rent or mortgage, food, transportation, health care, child care, etc.).  Low wage earners have little or none.  Whereas, a wealthy person might have close to 100% disposable income.  Perhaps an equal percentage tax on disposable income would be more fair.  Then there is the inherent unfairness of where and to whom you are born.

But, second, fairness isn't the only good measure.  Sometimes, we would be wise to take into account the common good.  In an earlier blog, I laid out a representation of what massive accumulation of wealth might look like.  In my summary I pointed out that the top ten billionaires at that time had $610.5 billion.  I posed the question: Is it better for the economy to have 10 multi-billionaires or 610,500 millionaires?  It might be fair by today's standards, but is it good for society?  I think there are many answers and nuances, but we should at least be asking the questions.

P.S. I highly recommend The Common Good by Robert Reich

- PeteBarkett.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That's How the Light Gets In On Economic Perspective $Million per day My argument in today's blog is that the rich, especially the ultra-rich do not need protection from people advocating redistribution of wealth downward.   I'm recalling "Joe, the Plumber", (who was not named Joe and was not a plumber) who was used by a conservative Presidential candidate to exemplify that liberals would try to tax away the opportunity to start a business and become wealthy.  Also, I've been accused of being a conspiracy theorist when I've complained that the ultra-wealthy collude to protect and increase their massive wealth.    So, I'll address three issues at once: 1.  Are we trying to deprive the wealthy of their lifestyle? 2.  Do ultra-wealthy have the time, resources, and inclination to conspire to strongly influence politics and economics? 3.  To get an idea of economics in general, it helps to have an understanding of wealth. ...
1 comment
Read more
On Past Judgements Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got til it's gone.  - Joni Mitchell In the 1976 Presidential election, I voted for John Anderson.  I was then, and still am, a liberal.  So, Gerald Ford was not a consideration, especially after he pardoned Nixon, which was unforgivable.  But I didn't trust Jimmy Carter, who claimed to be honest.  I didn't know much about the Southern Baptist Convention, but what I did know was that they opposed most everything that I supported.  Carter was a Southern Baptist, so Carter was out.  Four years later, I had changed my mind, and I enthusiastically supported Carter against Reagan, and over the years I grew to appreciate him more and more. Carter turned out to be much more honest and thoughtful than the average politician.   And he was open to change.  He recently left the Southern Baptist Convention after 60 years due to their belief that women should ...
Post a Comment
Read more
  The Trump Legend        What is the Trump story?   It will be quite different for followers and detractors.   I believe the reason that so many people can have completely opposite views of the same person and events lies in great part to our American, and perhaps human, myths.       I had occasion once to be watching a televangelist in the company of some fundamentalist in-laws.   Seeing this person crying while singing a hymn, I thought he was the phoniest person I had ever seen.   But one of my wife's aunts turned to me and said, "Isn't he the most sincere person you've ever seen?"   I didn't answer, but it occurred to me that we were sitting in the same room watching the same event with completely opposite views.   I love studying history, but I am now more careful to try and research the historian.       Some of us like to believe in heroic leaders following their ...
Post a Comment
Read more