Skip to main content

The Divine Watchmaker Fails to Persuade

 

                             The Divine Watchmaker Fails  to Persuade

Some Thoughts on an Old Argument

 

     I believe that actual philosophers have created far better treatments of this, but I haven't read them.  So, I can proceed without intimidation (maybe a little trepidation).

     Christian fundamentalists argue that a clock could not possibly be created by evolution.  The complexity of it requires that there must be a watchmaker.  Likewise, complex creatures, such as humans, must have been created by the Creator.  To me, it suggests the opposite.  Many creatures have clock-like functions built in, e.g. circadian rhythms, jet lag, etc., which are more biological and less mechanical in our way of categorizing,  For some reason, two unconnected examples also have popped into my head, sleep and mosquitos.

     First, sleep.  Why would the watchmaker create sleep and dreams, particularly rapid eye movement (REM) sleep which occurs during dreaming? 

     It is not difficult to understand how our brains, which require a great deal of energy to operate, might need time to rest.  Researchers suggest that up to 75% of an infant's energy goes toward brain development.  Infants sleep a lot.

     Apparently, dreaming aids in this rejuvenation.  Also, during REM sleep, people are known to often experience brief, temporary paralysis.  The temporary paralysis could be a mechanism to protect the dreamer from sudden jerking movements, which could endanger the individual, for example, by falling out of a tree or alerting a predator. 

     One can see how these traits could develop through evolution, but it makes little sense for a god to create them.

     When we build robots, we would be irrational to require that they sleep one-third of their existence.  There are better ways to prevent overload: add a little lubricant, install a fan.  This would apply to any machine: a dishwasher, a vehicle, a watch.  And it would be more irrational to add in dreaming, and paralysis while dreaming.

     Perhaps this god solves this by watching over us while we are sleeping.  But I wonder why a god with billions of times greater knowledge and power than us would build creatures with so many built-in quirks.  There are seven billion of us, plus billions more species just on one planet out of trillions of planets.  What rational god would create that nightmare of oversight.  In light of the billions of species that have gone extinct (95%?), it doesn't seem likely.  "He watches over the sparrow . . .", until he doesn't.

     Second, mosquitos.  Kurt Vonnegut, in one of his novels, wondered why god created the rattlesnake, a creature with a baby rattle on one end and two hypodermic syringes filled with deadly poison on the other.  What kind of a god would create that?  My favorite cruel creation is a species of mosquito that lays its eggs inside the larvae of a fly.  The eggs hatch as the larvae grows, providing an immediate food source.  In addition, the baby mosquitos eat around the vital organs, thus keeping their food supply fresher longer.  What kind of monstrous god would create that?  Definitely not the kind that I'd enjoy worshipping for eternity.

     So, my conclusion is: the more complexity, the less divinity.

 

- PeteBarkett.blogspot.com

1/18/21

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 Bannon Up! This analogy is far from perfect, but it represents to me a futile mindset.   A sacrifice bunt in baseball involves giving up an out to advance a runner into a better position to score a run.   Occasionally, a pitcher tries so hard to throw pitches that are difficult to bunt, that he ends up walking the batter, which moves the lead runner into scoring position, gets no out, and puts another runner on base.   I’ve heard former coaches and players announcing games cry, “He’s trying to make an out.   Let him!”   I believe Steve Bannon wants to go to prison, to make himself a martyr and hero to the right-wing nuts who support him.   I say, let him.   I’ve heard some pundits worry that convicting him would further infuriate the right-wing nuts.   I think it’s time to abandon that type of thinking.   We have seen time after time that making concessions to appease these people is completely unproductive.   They see conces...
Post a Comment
Read more

Musings

  Right-To-Lifers Don’t Go Far Enough       I was pro-choice, but I’ve changed my mind.   The problem is not that the State should govern what a woman does with her body, the problem is that the State has not gone far enough.   The argument is that to protect the life of a fetus, the State must overrule a woman’s privacy and bodily autonomy and regulate her body for her.   Fine.   If we want the State to be in the business of protecting life through bodily regulation, then go all in.   Stick to the prime directive.   Protect all life.   The State should govern both men and women to protect life.   The State should tell any healthy person what to do with their body in order to protect life.   So, if someone needs a kidney, liver, or any organ transplant to save their life, the State should find someone and take whatever parts are needed to save that life.   If not, then we are allowing organ-icide.   (...
Post a Comment
Read more
Inspired by "Is religion a force for good in the world?" - the debates with Christopher Hitchens Let's compare general religious tenets with general humanistic tenets: I assert that to be a good humanist you must follow the rules.   To be a good religious person you must break the rules. Religious:                                             Humanistic: love thy neighbor                                   love thy neighbor do good works                                       do good works live according to the scriptures              live according to what can be drawn from evidence (science) try to follow the dictates of god       ...
Post a Comment
Read more