Skip to main content

grooming

 

Political parties have long used wedge issues to encourage their members to turn out to vote.  Sometimes these issues are inflammatory, employing demonization, occasionally to the point of being dangerous.  I fear that this year, we are witnessing such an issue: the accusations of pedophilia.

  I realize that the Q-Anon conspiracy theorists have made this an issue for a couple of years now, but there is a new, and much more dangerous twist, that is surfacing that may turn out to be far more insidious.  Rather than merely accusing all Democrats and liberals of being child-trafficking pedophiles who drink children’s blood, they have broadened out the accusation to include grooming children for pedophiles.

  A bit of background:  you may remember the ardent believer who took a gun into a New York pizza parlor where he was told children were being kept in the basement by a cabal of pedophiles led by Hillary Clinton among others.  Fortunately, when he arrived, he was persuaded that no children were being abused, in fact there was no basement, and he surrendered to police without injuring anyone.

  But the “grooming” twist to the conspiracy theory is, to me, much more unsettling, because the scope of accusations can include anyone.  The theory is that pedophiles groom children, sometimes for years, before molesting them.  Moreover, they occasionally have accessories who help with the grooming without engaging in the molestation.  Grooming can include any acts to gain the trust of the child.

  Here’s the insidious nature of this theory:  anyone can be accused of grooming a child simply by being a good neighbor or friend.  If you babysit for a relative or neighbor, if you help a student with their homework, if you give them a Christmas present, any normal act of kindness can be twisted into an act of grooming.  The more acts of kindness you perform, i.e., the nicer you are, the more you may be vilified.

  It’s a brilliant and evil way to demonize the most loving people in one’s community.  I hope I’m wrong about the danger this may manifest.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let's Play Spy Games

Let's Play Spy Games      We've recently learned that a US asset inside the Kremlin had to leave Russia and come to live in the US.   This started me thinking in the most simplistic terms about international intelligence activities.   Of course, I have no credentials in this area, so this is just the speculation of a curious citizen.      We know that Vladimir Putin was formerly head of the KGB, one of the main intelligence agencies of the former Soviet Union.   As such, I would be surprised if he did not surveil everyone in his administration.   I'm guessing that this would entail giving false information to select people, then seeing if any of that info later turned up in some other countries' news, thus pointing directly to a particular person in his confidence.        Of course, US intelligence agencies are aware of this type of play, and have ways of countering it, or using it to our adva...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC

How to End Gridlock in Washington, DC      I'm calling on all Democrats to end the gridlock in Congress.  The plan is theoretically simple, perhaps a bit more difficult to achieve.  Here's what you do:  register to vote as a Republican.  "Are you crazy?," you say.  Let me explain.      I first conceived of this idea after the umpteenth election where a Democrat led in the polls, then was defeated handily in the election, due to voter suppression, redistricting, racial and political gerrymandering, and blatantly biased election laws, not to dismiss the possibility of tampering with unaccountable and hackable voting machines.  I thought that if Black, Latino, Asian and other minority voters registered as Republicans, it might make it more difficult to unethically suppress their ability to vote.      But then, thinking back to the days of Dixiecrats (Southern Democrats who beginning around ...
Post a Comment
Read more
I believe in god - my god.   I believe partly because my parents believed and raised me to believe.   But mostly because of my mortality.   My tenuous existence drives me to believe in a god or gods, or life forces, in outerworldly notions unsupported by any evidence other than the similar language or desires of others. Since the affirmation of others is the only support I have, I seek out affirmation in as many places and ways as I can find.   I try to spread the joy and comfort I experience from affirmation to others, claiming that I want them to share in what I have found, but actually needing to reaffirm my belief. The more people I can find or persuade toward my belief, the better. If I am insecure in my belief, I may become more adamant in my desire to spread my belief. I may become a missionary to teach my word.   If that is not enough, I may threaten those who disagree.   I may chastise or condemn them.   I may shun them.   I may imp...
Post a Comment
Read more